I'm not sure I understood this one:
Logging FIND on archived GC.com cache for found Non-GC.com cache.
It this the unusual condition where a cache not listed on GC.com has been placed where a listed cache once was. And, someone logs the unlisted cache as though he had found the listed one?
I have another case for you. This cache was missing for a while. Then somebody planted a real Letterbox nearby (withing 20 or so feet) of where the listed cache once was. Now, cachers are logging the Letterbox as a find for the cache. And GC, at least in the form of Prime Reviewer, finds this acceptable.
NOTE: I've mentioned this situation before.
I don't "get" that one either...like maybe people are finding a Terracache (isn't that "the other site"?) and logging a find on an archived cache to boost their number of finds on GC.com, the "official" site?
And what the heck is a "Pocket cache"? Obviously some of the items on this little graph refer to things that don't seem to be so epidemic these days...but I still thought it was pretty funny!